Provenance

Show your working.

Most short-term rental intelligence is modelled from comparables: listings observed from the outside, by a company that has never taken a booking. That is a reasonable way to estimate a market and an unreliable way to underwrite a purchase, and it is why buyers treat these figures as indicative rather than dependable.

Stayful is a management company. We forecast a property’s income, then — for the ones we take on — operate it and find out what it really earned. This page is the whole of that: every source we use, how the number is assembled, and the record of where our forecasts landed against Jan–Dec 2025 reality.

Where the numbers come from

Everyone models the market.
We also book it.

Six intelligence sources give us the market. The properties we manage ourselves give us the truth about it. Where the two disagree, we say so.

01 / Partner data

The market, from outside.

Airbtics, PropertyData, Google Places, Ticketmaster, the EPC register and Companies House. Named on every figure they produce, so you can see which part of a report rests on someone else's data.

02 / Our own bookings

The market, from inside it.

The UK short-lets under Stayful management, plus the direct bookings we take ourselves. Real nightly rates, real occupancy, real owner net after fees and cleaning — not comparables.

03 / The check

What happens when they disagree.

Because we operate the properties, we find out whether a forecast was right. Where the model and the year diverge, the variance is published rather than quietly corrected.

Licensed & public
AirbticsPropertyDataGoogle PlacesTicketmasterEPC RegisterCompanies House
Our own bookings
Stayful managed portfolioStayful direct bookings
Every source, named

What each one can tell us.

Two of these we generate ourselves by operating properties. The rest we license or take from public registers. Each entry says what it contributes and where it runs out — a source with no stated limit is a source nobody has examined.

Stayful managed portfolioOursReal bookings, real costs

Nightly rates, occupancy, cleaning and turnaround costs from the UK short-lets we manage ourselves. Observed, not inferred — but it only covers the markets we operate in.

100 / 100
Stayful direct bookingsOursRevenue net of platform fees

Bookings taken on our own channels, which is the only way to see what a night actually earns once the platform's cut is removed.

100 / 100
AirbticspartnerLive Airbnb comparables

Active listings near the postcode. Strong on what a market looks like from the outside; it cannot see a listing's real costs or cancellations.

95 / 100
PropertyDatapartnerSold comparables and long-let values

Sale prices and rental benchmarks, used for yield-on-cost and the long-let comparison. Lags the market by the length of a conveyance.

88 / 100
Google PlacespartnerAmenities and location context

What is actually near the property. Good coverage in cities, thinner in rural areas.

90 / 100
TicketmasterpartnerDemand drivers and event calendars

Scheduled events that move nightly rates. Catches arenas and festivals; misses private and unticketed demand.

85 / 100
EPC RegisterpublicProperty size, age and efficiency

Official floor area and energy rating, which feed running costs. Only as current as the last assessment.

92 / 100
Companies HousepublicOperator and ownership signals

Who else is operating at scale in the area. Statutory filings, so accurate but slow.

94 / 100
How the number is built

A figure you can interrogate.

Not a black box. Four steps, in order, and you can argue with any of them.

01

Start from the market, not the property.

Live comparables near the postcode set the range. This is the same class of data every platform in the category works from, and on its own it is a guess about a property nobody has operated.

02

Adjust for what the property actually is.

Size and efficiency from the EPC register, amenities and location from Google Places, event-driven demand from the calendar. A three-bed on a main road and a three-bed on a green do not earn the same, and comparables alone cannot see the difference.

03

Cost it the way an operator costs it.

Cleaning, turnaround, platform fees and management come off the top using the rates we pay on our own portfolio — not a percentage assumption. This is where a headline revenue figure and an owner-net figure stop resembling each other.

04

Check it against properties we run.

Because we manage short-lets ourselves, a forecast is not the end of the process. Twelve months later we know what the property did, and that variance goes back into the model and onto the ledger below.

Forecast vs actual

Here’s what we forecast.
Here’s what actually happened.

Six properties Stayful took under management in 2025. For each, the Income Estimate we produced before it went live, next to twelve months of real bookings. No retro-fitting, no cherry-picked month.

6 of 6properties earned more for the owner than we forecast
4.9 ptsthe largest occupancy miss across the six
Property
Forecast net
Actual net
Variance
Occupancy
17 Park CrescentYork · 3 bed · Sleeps 8
£30,940
£34,727
+12.2%
−4.1 pts
7 Beechwood MountLeeds · 3 bed · Sleeps 8
£23,084
£25,782
+11.7%
−3.6 pts
Museum CourtLincoln · 2 bed · Sleeps 6
£32,364
£36,288
+12.1%
−3.8 pts
21 Geissler DriveEdinburgh · 1 bed · Sleeps 4
£36,175
£46,169
+27.6%
+1.6 pts
803 Eastbank TowerManchester · 3 bed · Sleeps 8
£32,422
£35,917
+10.8%
−4.3 pts
West Street, WiltonSalisbury · 2 bed · Sleeps 6
£29,557
£33,654
+13.9%
−4.9 pts

n = 6 · Forecasts produced pre-onboarding, Nov 2024 – Feb 2025 · Actuals from Airbnb host dashboards and Stayful direct bookings, Jan–Dec 2025 · Owner net is after platform fees, cleaning and management · Occupancy variance is in percentage points. Six properties is a small sample, and past results are not a forecast.

Where our model is wrong, and why

Occupancy runs slightly high. On five of the six, the property was occupied a little less than we projected — by 3.2 points on average. We would rather show that than round it away.

Nightly rate is a harder problem, and it is the reason ADR is not in the table above. Our forecast quotes a rate per booked night; the figure that comes back off a host dashboard at year end is built on a different denominator, so putting the two side by side would imply a gap that is partly definitional rather than a real miss. Until we can publish both on identical terms, showing them as a like-for-like comparison would be misleading, so we don’t. Owner net — the number a purchase decision actually turns on — is measured the same way on both sides, and that is what the ledger reports.

Why we built this

We're a management company first.

Stayful runs short-lets for owners across the UK. Every week we get the same question from people thinking about turning a property into a short-let — what could it actually earn? The Analyser is our answer: the same model we use to estimate income before we take a property under management, now available to anyone who needs that decision in 20 seconds rather than on a sales call.

The founders

Built by people who run the model.

Zac Harrison

Co-founder

Zac started his Airbnb journey in late 2019 at 21, with little money and a strong will to succeed. Three years later he runs a 7-figure Airbnb business with 30+ rent-to-rent properties across the country — and an Airbnb-focused interior design studio that fits out properties for other operators.

Martyn Butler

Co-founder

Martyn started in 2020 with a passion for property but without the deposits to buy. He took the rent-to-rent route, self-managed his own portfolio for several years, and founded Stayful — an Airbnb management company built on operator experience and focused on hands-off profitability for its customers.

The awkward questions

Answers, not pitches.

Because we operate the properties, so we find out. For the six short-lets Stayful took under management in 2025, the ledger on this page shows the Income Estimate produced before each went live next to twelve months of real bookings. Six is a small sample and we say so; it is also six more named, dated, published comparisons than the category usually offers.

It is a fair question. Running the properties is what lets us check a forecast against reality, and it also gives us a commercial interest in you liking the number. Two things keep us honest: the estimate is produced before we know whether a property will come under management, and we publish the variance either way — including where the model was wrong. Most Analyser users never become management clients, and the tool is priced to work that way.

Because our forecast and the year-end figure are not currently measuring it the same way. Our estimate quotes a rate per booked night; the number that comes back off a host dashboard is built on a different denominator. Putting them side by side would show a gap that is partly definitional rather than a real miss, so we have left it out until we can publish both on identical terms. Owner net is measured the same way on both sides, which is why the ledger reports that.

No. You see the realistic range, not a best-case projection. The figure you take into a decision is the figure you can defend to a lender.

You get the market data every platform has — live comparables, long-let benchmarks, demand drivers — without the first-party layer on top. The report says which is which rather than presenting both with the same confidence.

Run your first property

Stop guessing.
Start analysing.

Type any UK postcode and get a full 10-section report in under 20 seconds. Free, no card required.

Free trial · No card Full 10-section report 10–20 second analysis