A transparent composite of four factors — we show our working. Higher is better.
| Factor | What it measures | Points |
|---|---|---|
| Yield-on-cost | 16.9% gross yield | 40 / 40 |
| Occupancy | 68% occupancy | 20 / 25 |
| Revenue scale | £79,092/yr | 20 / 20 |
| Regulatory ease | Licensing unconfirmed | 6 / 15 |
Short vs long-let: not enough data
We couldn’t fetch an area long-let comparator for KT postcode area, so the short-vs-long verdict isn’t available for this area yet.
| Beds | Samples | ADR | Occupancy | Gross rev | Property value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | £146 | 61.0% | £32,580 | — |
| 3 | 2 | £320 | 72.5% | £84,754 | £399,500–£540,500 |
| 5 | 1 | £475 | 66.0% | £114,279 | £629,000–£851,000 |
Crosses the Greater London boundary into Surrey; the 90-night rule applies only within Greater London.
This postcode area straddles a jurisdiction boundary, so rules can differ within it — treat this as unconfirmed and check the specific local authority.
These are area averages. To model a specific address — with its own comparables, risk profile and 12-month forecast — run it through the Stayful analyser.
KT postcode area figures are averages from 4 Stayful analyser samples across the KT postcode area — indicative, not a guarantee of returns. Licensing is a general guide; confirm with the local authority before buying.