A transparent composite of four factors — we show our working. Higher is better. This score is partial: no area property-value data, so yield-on-cost is excluded and the other factors are reweighted.
| Factor | What it measures | Points |
|---|---|---|
| Yield-on-cost | No property-value data | excluded |
| Occupancy | 61% occupancy | 14.6 / 25 |
| Revenue scale | £72,643/yr | 20 / 20 |
| Regulatory ease | Licensing unconfirmed | 6 / 15 |
Short vs long-let: not enough data
We couldn’t fetch an area long-let comparator for CW postcode area, so the short-vs-long verdict isn’t available for this area yet.
| Beds | Samples | ADR | Occupancy | Gross rev | Property value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1 | £156 | 65.0% | £37,065 | — |
| 4 | 1 | £525 | 56.0% | £108,220 | — |
We have not yet confirmed the current short-term-let licensing status for this area against an authoritative source. Check with the local authority before proceeding.
These are area averages. To model a specific address — with its own comparables, risk profile and 12-month forecast — run it through the Stayful analyser.
CW postcode area figures are averages from 2 Stayful analyser samples across the CW postcode area — indicative, not a guarantee of returns. Licensing is a general guide; confirm with the local authority before buying.