A transparent composite of four factors — we show our working. Higher is better. This score is partial: no area property-value data, so yield-on-cost is excluded and the other factors are reweighted.
| Factor | What it measures | Points |
|---|---|---|
| Yield-on-cost | No property-value data | excluded |
| Occupancy | 69% occupancy | 20.5 / 25 |
| Revenue scale | £61,411/yr | 20 / 20 |
| Regulatory ease | Licensing unconfirmed | 6 / 15 |
Short vs long-let: not enough data
We couldn’t fetch an area long-let comparator for CR postcode area, so the short-vs-long verdict isn’t available for this area yet.
| Beds | Samples | ADR | Occupancy | Gross rev | Property value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1 | £241 | 70.0% | £61,547 | — |
| 3 | 1 | £212 | 68.0% | £52,566 | — |
| 4 | 1 | £282 | 68.0% | £70,120 | — |
Crosses the Greater London boundary into Surrey; the 90-night rule applies only within Greater London.
This postcode area straddles a jurisdiction boundary, so rules can differ within it — treat this as unconfirmed and check the specific local authority.
These are area averages. To model a specific address — with its own comparables, risk profile and 12-month forecast — run it through the Stayful analyser.
CR postcode area figures are averages from 3 Stayful analyser samples across the CR postcode area — indicative, not a guarantee of returns. Licensing is a general guide; confirm with the local authority before buying.