A transparent composite of four factors — we show our working. Higher is better. This score is partial: no area property-value data, so yield-on-cost is excluded and the other factors are reweighted.
| Factor | What it measures | Points |
|---|---|---|
| Yield-on-cost | No property-value data | excluded |
| Occupancy | 57% occupancy | 12.4 / 25 |
| Revenue scale | £72,788/yr | 20 / 20 |
| Regulatory ease | No licence required | 15 / 15 |
Short vs long-let: not enough data
We couldn’t fetch an area long-let comparator for Bournemouth, so the short-vs-long verdict isn’t available for this area yet.
| Beds | Samples | ADR | Occupancy | Gross rev | Property value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | £85 | 72.0% | £22,338 | — |
| 3 | 1 | £256 | 53.0% | £50,599 | — |
| 5 | 2 | £567 | 52.0% | £109,107 | — |
No short-term-let-specific licence or registration currently applies in this area — normal letting rules only.
Heads-up: A national registration scheme (Levelling-Up & Regeneration Act 2023) is legislated but not yet live as of July 2026; a proposed C5 short-let use class has not yet come into force.
These are area averages. To model a specific address — with its own comparables, risk profile and 12-month forecast — run it through the Stayful analyser.
Bournemouth figures are averages from 4 Stayful analyser samples across the BH postcode area — indicative, not a guarantee of returns. Licensing is a general guide; confirm with the local authority before buying.